The paradigm wars and the incompatibility thesis live on: Trends and adequacy in the use of mixed methods research in the Ghana Journal of Development Studies

Kennedy Alatinga; Gilbert A. Abiiro; Jonas A Akudugu

doi:10.36005/jplm.v2i1.47

Authors

Kennedy Alatinga Department of Community Development, Faculty of Planning and Land Management, SD-Dombo University of Business and Integrated Development Studies, Wa, Ghana
Gilbert A. Abiiro Department of Health Services, Policy, Planning, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
Jonas A Akudugu Department of Planning and Sustainability, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36005/jplm.v2i1.47

Abstract

Despite the potential of mixed methods research (MMR) in providing a comprehensive picture of development issues, its pervasiveness and use in development studies is limited. This paper examines the use of MMR as reflected in contributions to the Ghana Journal of Development Studies (GJDS). Based on a rapid review and content analysis of 105 articles, published in the GJDS over the period 2010 to 2017, this paper illustrates there is an inadequate use of MMR among the community of researchers contributing articles to the GJDS. Specifically, only 16 percent of journal articles used MMR, whereas 52 percent and 32 percent used solely quantitative and qualitative approaches, respectively. The huge use of mono-methods and the paucity of MMR in the field of development studies suggest that the ‘paradigm wars’ and the ‘incompatibility thesis’ are not over. Eighty-six percent of articles that reportedly used MMR did not mention the purposes for employing it, explain the typologies of its designs used, the stages, or even the way the qualitative and quantitative data were integrated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alatinga, K. A. & Williams, J. J. (2019). Mixed methods research for health policy development in Africa: the case of identifying very poor households for health insurance premium exemptions in Ghana. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1) 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816665056

Alexander, E., Eppler, M. J. & Comi, A. (2021). Data integration: a real-time, participant-driven, and visually supported method. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820902294

Alise, M. A. & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the Social/Behavioral Sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809360805

Bradley, M., & Krentel, A. (2020). Reframing integration for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819879352

Brannen, J. (2018). In memoriam: Alan Bryman. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 254–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818779434

Brown, A., Hecker, K. G., Bok, H. & Ellaway, R. H. (2021). Strange bedfellows: Exploring methodological intersections between realist inquiry and structural equation modelling. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820970692

Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877

Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531

Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods ((3rd Ed.)). Great Clarendon Street Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cochrane, L. & Thornton, A. (2018). The geography of development studies: leaving no one behind. Forum for Development Studies, 45(1), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1345786

Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Sutton, I. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed-methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4(1), 67–100.

Creswell, J., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L. & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. (Commissioned by the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research). USA: Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Retrieved fromhttp://obssr.od.nih.gov/mixed_methods_research/pdf/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D. & Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annuals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.104.

Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

De Allegri M, Sieleunou I, Abiiro GA, & Ridde V. (2018). How far is mixed methods research in the field of health policy and systems in Africa? A scoping review. Health Policy Plan. 2018 Apr 1;33(3):445-455. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx182. PMID: 29365123; PMCID: PMC5886233.

DeJonckheere, M., Lindquist-Grantz, R., Toraman, S., Haddad, K. & Vaughn, L. M. (2018). Intersection of mixed methods and community-based participatory research: a methodological review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1558689818778469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818778469

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Fetters, M. D. (2018). Six equations to help conceptualize the field of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818779433

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A. & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and Practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Fetters, M. D. & Freshwater, D. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222

Fetters, M. D. & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: the mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817714066

Fielding, N. G. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods design data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101

Gage, N. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: a “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018007004

Ghiara, V. (2020). Disambiguating the role of paradigms in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818819928

Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969

Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255

Hammersley, M. (2008). Troubles with triangulation. In: Bergman, Manfred Max (ed). Advances in Mixed Methods Research. (pp. 22–36). London: SAGE Publications.

Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: The Guilford Press

Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017008010

Johnson, R. B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Love, H. R. & Corr, C. (2021). Integrating without quantitizing: two examples of deductive analysis strategies within qualitatively driven mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1558689821989833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689821989833

Lynam, T., Damayanti, R., Rialine Titaley, C., Suharno, N. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Introduction: Putting the MIXED back into quantitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: Moving toward the radical middle. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches; Maleny, 6(3), 192–219.

Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307

Morgan, D. L. (2018). Living within blurry boundaries: the value of distinguishing between qualitative and quantitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816686433

Ngulube, P., Mokwatlo, K. & Ndwandwe, S. (2009). Utilisation and prevalence of mixed methods research in library and information research in South Africa 2002-2008. SA Jnl Libs & Info Sci, 75(2), 105–116.

Ngulube, P., & Ngulube, B. (2015). Mixed methods research in The South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences: an investigation of trends in the literature. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17159/2222-3436/2015/v18n1a1

Shannon-Baker, P. (2015). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1558689815575861. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815575861

Tricco, A. C., Antony, J., Zarin, W., Strifler, L., Ghassemi, M., Ivory, J., Perrier, L., Hutton, B., Moher, D. & Straus, S. E. (2015). A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6

Woolley, C. M. (2008). Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325774